RAM PRAKASH CHOUDHARY vs STATE — 248/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2)3(4). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPU010021442026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
1995/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
248/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
4-2nd DASJ
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
591
Police Station
PURNEA SADAR
Year
26
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM PRAKASH CHOUDHARY
Adv. MD SHAMSHER ALAM
RANJIT CHOHDARY
Respondent(s)
STATE
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd DASJ
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea, rejected the bail petition of Ram Prakash Choudhary and Ranjit Choudhary, who were accused of selling duplicate/defective pesticides and insecticides without valid licenses under BNS sections and Trade Mark/Copyright Acts. The court found sufficient evidence against the accused, including recovery of counterfeit products from their possession witnessed by independent witnesses, absence of valid selling licenses, and a submitted charge sheet, concluding that the risk of evidence tampering and public harm warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea, rejected the bail petition of Ram Prakash Choudhary and Ranjit Choudhary, who were accused of selling duplicate/defective pesticides and insecticides without valid licenses under BNS sections and Trade Mark/Copyright Acts. The court found sufficient evidence against the accused, including recovery of counterfeit products from their possession witnessed by independent witnesses, absence of valid selling licenses, and a submitted charge sheet, concluding that the risk of evidence tampering and public harm warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts