HEERA SHARMA ALIAS HEERALAL PANJIKAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 396/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,323,325,328,354,504. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010020622026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
1915/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
396/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
211
Police Station
BANMANKHI
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEERA SHARMA ALIAS HEERALAL PANJIKAR
Adv. Chandra Kishore Chandu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 396/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to Heera Sharma @ Heeralal Panjikar in connection with Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 211/2013, involving charges under IPC sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 328, 354, and 504 (unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and assault). The court found no specific overt act against the petitioner despite him being named in the FIR, and noted that co-accused persons had already been granted similar bail relief by the same court, placing the petitioner's case on identical footing. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a Purnea resident, and directions to expedite the 13-year-old trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 396/2026
Case Summary: 396/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to Heera Sharma @ Heeralal Panjikar in connection with Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 211/2013, involving charges under IPC sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 328, 354, and 504 (unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and assault). The court found no specific overt act against the petitioner despite him being named in the FIR, and noted that co-accused persons had already been granted similar bail relief by the same court, placing the petitioner's case on identical footing. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a Purnea resident, and directions to expedite the 13-year-old trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts