MD RAJIV vs STATE OF BIHAR — 391/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303,2,317,4,317,5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010020552026
Filing Number
1908/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
391/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
193
Police Station
MIRGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD RAJIV
Adv. PRADIP KR MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court rejected Md. Rajiv's anticipatory bail petition in a stolen motorcycle case. The court found that Rajiv allegedly provided stolen motorcycles to co-accused Md. Touhid for sale, has a prior criminal record, and is believed to be part of an organized vehicle theft gang, making anticipatory bail inappropriate. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the lower court and seek regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 391/2026
The court rejected Md. Rajiv's anticipatory bail petition in a stolen motorcycle case. The court found that Rajiv allegedly provided stolen motorcycles to co-accused Md. Touhid for sale, has a prior criminal record, and is believed to be part of an organized vehicle theft gang, making anticipatory bail inappropriate. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the lower court and seek regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts