MD DILSHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 380/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2) B.N.S. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010019512026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
1806/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
380/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
MIRGANJ
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD DILSHER
Adv. ZEBA PARWEEN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
-
2.SAWANA KHTOON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: MD DILSHER v. STATE OF BIHAR (ABP 380/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to MD DILSHER, aged 22, who faced charges under sections 85 and 115(2) BNS for alleged cruelty and dowry-related offenses in a matrimonial dispute with his wife Savana Khatoon. The court found the alleged offences non-serious (punishable under 7 years imprisonment), noted failed mediation attempts, the complainant's financial difficulties, and the petitioner's willingness to pay Rs. 2,000 monthly maintenance, rendering bail appropriate under Supreme Court precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 380/2026
Case Summary: MD DILSHER v. STATE OF BIHAR (ABP 380/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to MD DILSHER, aged 22, who faced charges under sections 85 and 115(2) BNS for alleged cruelty and dowry-related offenses in a matrimonial dispute with his wife Savana Khatoon. The court found the alleged offences non-serious (punishable under 7 years imprisonment), noted failed mediation attempts, the complainant's financial difficulties, and the petitioner's willingness to pay Rs. 2,000 monthly maintenance, rendering bail appropriate under Supreme Court precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts