EJAHARUL vs STATE — 226/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(2),303(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPU010018782026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

1738/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

226/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

DAGARUA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(2),303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EJAHARUL

    Adv. MANI KUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.MD SAJID

  3. 3.EBRAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Purnea rejected the bail petition of Ejaharul, Md. Sajid, and Ebrar, finding substantial evidence against them for theft of a motorcycle under BNS Section 303(2). Although the three petitioners were not named in the FIR, police intelligence indicated they were operating the stolen vehicle and attempting to sell it; they subsequently admitted guilt in confessional statements and directed police to recover the motorcycle from their accomplice's residence. The court deemed the alleged offense serious in nature with investigation ongoing, and permitted the petitioners to renew their bail application only after charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 226/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Purnea rejected the bail petition of Ejaharul, Md. Sajid, and Ebrar, finding substantial evidence against them for theft of a motorcycle under BNS Section 303(2). Although the three petitioners were not named in the FIR, police intelligence indicated they were operating the stolen vehicle and attempting to sell it; they subsequently admitted guilt in confessional statements and directed police to recover the motorcycle from their accomplice's residence. The court deemed the alleged offense serious in nature with investigation ongoing, and permitted the petitioners to renew their bail application only after charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case