MD MANSUR ALAM vs STATE OF BIHAR — 348/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,2,318,4,352,351,2,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010016692026

Filing Number

1550/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

348/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

4-2nd Dasj

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

CHAMPANAGAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,2,318,4,352,351,2,3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD MANSUR ALAM

    Adv. PADAM SOURABH PARAG

  2. 2.MD AKMAL

  3. 3.MD MASREKUL ALAM

  4. 4.MD KALIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 348/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to MD Mansur Alam and two others in a dispute arising from a motorcycle purchase agreement. Finding the case to be primarily civil in nature with both parties present and no objection from the informant, the court allowed bail with a bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, noting the petitioners are local residents with no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Dasj

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 348/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to MD Mansur Alam and two others in a dispute arising from a motorcycle purchase agreement. Finding the case to be primarily civil in nature with both parties present and no objection from the informant, the court allowed bail with a bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, noting the petitioners are local residents with no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case