SONU KUMAR, SAINTI, SONU vs STATE OF BIHAR — 204/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,1,61,2,3,5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPU010016662026
Filing Number
1547/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
204/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
PURNEA SADAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONU KUMAR, SAINTI, SONU
Adv. PADAM SOURABH PARAG
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 204/2026 Court Decision: The bail petition of Sonu Kumar was REJECTED. Key Reasoning: The Principal Sessions Judge found that the allegations against the petitioner were heinous in nature. CCTV footage established that Sonu Kumar entered the hotel room before the murder and exited after it occurred; co-accused Vikash Kumar's confessional statement implicated the petitioner; and witnesses corroborated the prosecution version. Given the serious nature of the allegations (conspiracy to commit murder with the victim's body being partially hanged), ongoing investigation, and supporting evidence, the court declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 204/2026
Case Summary: 204/2026 Court Decision: The bail petition of Sonu Kumar was REJECTED. Key Reasoning: The Principal Sessions Judge found that the allegations against the petitioner were heinous in nature. CCTV footage established that Sonu Kumar entered the hotel room before the murder and exited after it occurred; co-accused Vikash Kumar's confessional statement implicated the petitioner; and witnesses corroborated the prosecution version. Given the serious nature of the allegations (conspiracy to commit murder with the victim's body being partially hanged), ongoing investigation, and supporting evidence, the court declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts