SANJIV SAHANI, SANJIT SAHANI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 202/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPU010016322026
Filing Number
1522/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
202/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
574
Police Station
PURNEA SADAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJIV SAHANI, SANJIT SAHANI
Adv. JAY PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Sanjiv Sahani v. State of Bihar (BP 202/2026) The Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioner Sanjiv Sahani, accused in a dowry death case involving the alleged murder of his sister-in-law. The court found that while the FIR alleged the petitioner committed murder with common intention, witness statements contradicted these allegations, and there was no specific overt act linking him to the offense. The judge noted the petitioner lived separately from the deceased and her husband, had clean antecedents, and had already spent over three months in judicial custody. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 202/2026
Case Summary: Sanjiv Sahani v. State of Bihar (BP 202/2026) The Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioner Sanjiv Sahani, accused in a dowry death case involving the alleged murder of his sister-in-law. The court found that while the FIR alleged the petitioner committed murder with common intention, witness statements contradicted these allegations, and there was no specific overt act linking him to the offense. The judge noted the petitioner lived separately from the deceased and her husband, had clean antecedents, and had already spent over three months in judicial custody. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts