PAWAN KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 175/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 238,3,5,103,1. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPU010014612026

Filing Number

1361/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

175/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

MOHANPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 238,3,5,103,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. KUMAR NANDAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Purnea, rejected the bail petition of Pawan Kumar, who is accused of murdering his wife Seema Kumari through strangulation, allegedly due to dowry harassment. The court found the allegations against the petitioner to be of serious and heinous nature, noting his confessional statement admitting the death by strangulation and subsequent disposal of the body by burning and throwing it in a river, making bail unsuitable given the gravity of charges and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Purnea, rejected the bail petition of Pawan Kumar, who is accused of murdering his wife Seema Kumari through strangulation, allegedly due to dowry harassment. The court found the allegations against the petitioner to be of serious and heinous nature, noting his confessional statement admitting the death by strangulation and subsequent disposal of the body by burning and throwing it in a river, making bail unsuitable given the gravity of charges and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case