PINKI DEVI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 289/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,66,87,78,352. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010012902026

Filing Number

1202/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

289/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

184

Police Station

TIKA PATTI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,66,87,78,352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINKI DEVI

    Adv. NIRANJAN KUMAR

  2. 2.GUNJAN DEVI

  3. 3.JAI PRAKASH SHARMA

  4. 4.PRADEEP SHARMA

  5. 5.ABHISHEK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Gunjan Devi and Jai Prakash Sharma (parents of the main accused). Although the victim's statement did not mention their involvement in the rape allegations against their son, the investigating authority found them liable only for bailable offences under sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, and 351/3(5) of BNS 2023, making pre-arrest bail unmaintainable in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Gunjan Devi and Jai Prakash Sharma (parents of the main accused). Although the victim's statement did not mention their involvement in the rape allegations against their son, the investigating authority found them liable only for bailable offences under sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, and 351/3(5) of BNS 2023, making pre-arrest bail unmaintainable in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case