SHISHIR KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 132/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 338,336,3,340,2,316,4,318,4. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPU010011272026
Filing Number
1050/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
132/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
04
Police Station
RUPAULI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHISHIR KUMAR
Adv. ZEBA PARWEEN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal District and Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Shishir Kumar, a Lower Division Clerk accused of defalcating approximately ₹24,27,840 in government revenue by forging the Circle Officer's signature and making fraudulent withdrawals from the Circle Office account. The court found the allegations grave and serious, noting the petitioner's confessional statement admitting guilt and forensic evidence of forged signatures, and determined that bail could not be granted while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 132/2026
The Principal District and Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Shishir Kumar, a Lower Division Clerk accused of defalcating approximately ₹24,27,840 in government revenue by forging the Circle Officer's signature and making fraudulent withdrawals from the Circle Office account. The court found the allegations grave and serious, noting the petitioner's confessional statement admitting guilt and forensic evidence of forged signatures, and determined that bail could not be granted while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts