MD IZHAR ASHRAF vs STATE OF BIHAR — 216/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010009732026

Filing Number

905/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

216/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD IZHAR ASHRAF

    Adv. MD. ANDLIB MONU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

  2. 2.BIBI SHAHENUR KHATOON alias CHAND BANO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to MD Izhar Ashraf in a matrimonial dispute case involving allegations of bigamy, dowry harassment, and cruelty under BNS Section 85. The court found the allegations general in nature and was persuaded by the petitioner's willingness to settle the matter amicably and pay ₹3,000 monthly interim maintenance to his wife. Bail was granted on furnishing ₹10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 216/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to MD Izhar Ashraf in a matrimonial dispute case involving allegations of bigamy, dowry harassment, and cruelty under BNS Section 85. The court found the allegations general in nature and was persuaded by the petitioner's willingness to settle the matter amicably and pay ₹3,000 monthly interim maintenance to his wife. Bail was granted on furnishing ₹10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case