SONU KUMAR MANDAL vs STATE OF BIHAR — 187/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 82,85,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010008482026
Filing Number
790/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
187
Police Station
MIRGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONU KUMAR MANDAL
Adv. Kumar Santosh Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
-
2.MANJU KUMARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sonu Kumar Mandal and four co-petitioners (in-laws) in a matrimonial dispute case involving charges of dowry-related torture and harassment. The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled the dispute through mediation, with Mandal paying Rs. 1,75,000 and undertaking to pay the remaining Rs. 1,75,000 to the informant (his wife), who confirmed having no grievance against the petitioners. All petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to BNSS Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 187/2026
The Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sonu Kumar Mandal and four co-petitioners (in-laws) in a matrimonial dispute case involving charges of dowry-related torture and harassment. The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled the dispute through mediation, with Mandal paying Rs. 1,75,000 and undertaking to pay the remaining Rs. 1,75,000 to the informant (his wife), who confirmed having no grievance against the petitioners. All petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to BNSS Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts