NOUMAN, MD NOUMAN ALAM vs STATE OF BIHAR — 65/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,76,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010002272026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
205/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
65/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
524
Police Station
AMOUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NOUMAN, MD NOUMAN ALAM
Adv. MD NAZIR AHMAD
SALMAN, MD. SALMAN
GULASHAN, GULSSHAN
SAKIL, SAKIL ALAM
GAJIYA, GAJIYA PRAWEEN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
SAJRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Nouman (the husband) due to his negligent attitude and failure to protect his wife despite filing an undertaking, holding him solely responsible for her continued torture. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the four other petitioners (brother-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, and sister-in-law) as there were no specific allegations against them and the charged offences carry maximum sentences not exceeding seven years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Nouman (the husband) due to his negligent attitude and failure to protect his wife despite filing an undertaking, holding him solely responsible for her continued torture. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the four other petitioners (brother-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, and sister-in-law) as there were no specific allegations against them and the charged offences carry maximum sentences not exceeding seven years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts