NOUMAN, MD NOUMAN ALAM vs STATE OF BIHAR — 65/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,76,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010002272026

Filing Number

205/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

524

Police Station

AMOUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,76,352,351(2),3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NOUMAN, MD NOUMAN ALAM

    Adv. MD NAZIR AHMAD

  2. 2.SALMAN, MD. SALMAN

  3. 3.GULASHAN, GULSSHAN

  4. 4.SAKIL, SAKIL ALAM

  5. 5.GAJIYA, GAJIYA PRAWEEN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

  2. 2.SAJRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Nouman (the husband) due to his negligent attitude and failure to protect his wife despite filing an undertaking, holding him solely responsible for her continued torture. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the four other petitioners (brother-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, and sister-in-law) as there were no specific allegations against them and the charged offences carry maximum sentences not exceeding seven years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Nouman (the husband) due to his negligent attitude and failure to protect his wife despite filing an undertaking, holding him solely responsible for her continued torture. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the four other petitioners (brother-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, and sister-in-law) as there were no specific allegations against them and the charged offences carry maximum sentences not exceeding seven years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case