Sanjeeda Khatoon W/o Late Nasimuddinand others vs Soiba Khatoon W/o Late Abban Mailck and others — 34/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: DOCUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.
Partition Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BRPA520000742020
Next Hearing
23rd May 2026
Filing Number
68/2020
Filing Date
24-12-2020
Registration No
34/2020
Registration Date
24-12-2020
Court
Paliganj Civil Division
Judge
2-Civil Judge Sr. Div
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjeeda Khatoon W/o Late Nasimuddinand others
Adv. Sumit Kumar,Bipin Bihari Singh
Respondent(s)
Soiba Khatoon W/o Late Abban Mailck and others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge Sr. Div
DOCUMENTS
DOCUMENTS
DOCUMENTS
u/s 89CPC
Appearence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | DOCUMENTS |
| 18-12-2025 | DOCUMENTS |
| 13-11-2025 | DOCUMENTS |
| 28-08-2025 | u/s 89CPC |
| 05-07-2025 | Appearence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court granted a status-quo preservation order on the suit property in this partition case (Title Suit 34/2020) filed by Sanjeeda Khatoon and others against Soiba Khatoon and others. The court directed all parties not to alienate, encumber, or alter the suit property (Schedule 2), noting that defendants had executed multiple sale deeds despite the litigation's pendency. The court held that preservation of the subject matter is the court's duty to ensure the final decree is not rendered barren, and parties must seek court permission before any transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court granted a status-quo preservation order on the suit property in this partition case (Title Suit 34/2020) filed by Sanjeeda Khatoon and others against Soiba Khatoon and others. The court directed all parties not to alienate, encumber, or alter the suit property (Schedule 2), noting that defendants had executed multiple sale deeds despite the litigation's pendency. The court held that preservation of the subject matter is the court's duty to ensure the final decree is not rendered barren, and parties must seek court permission before any transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts