Smt. Bindu Devi W/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh vs Shri Manish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh and Ors. — 4/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRPA520000062022
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
Filing Number
6/2022
Filing Date
21-01-2022
Registration No
4/2022
Registration Date
21-01-2022
Court
Paliganj Civil Division
Judge
2-Civil Judge Sr. Div
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Bindu Devi W/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh
Adv. Rana Ranjit Kumar
Respondent(s)
Shri Manish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh and Ors.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge Sr. Div
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ISSUES |
| 03-03-2026 | ISSUES |
| 06-01-2026 | ISSUES |
| 14-10-2025 | ISSUES |
| 26-08-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Order Summary: The Court of Sub-Judge, Paliganj granted an interim injunction petition (dated 26/07/2024) in Title Suit Case No. 04/2022. The plaintiff challenged a 2021 sale deed executed by her son (defendant 1) to defendant 2, claiming the disputed land was her exclusive Stridhan property acquired via a 1998 gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor and determined the balance of convenience favored her, concluding the property faced danger of alienation. Accordingly, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo and prohibited any alienation or sale of the disputed property without court permission until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order Summary: The Court of Sub-Judge, Paliganj granted an interim injunction petition (dated 26/07/2024) in Title Suit Case No. 04/2022. The plaintiff challenged a 2021 sale deed executed by her son (defendant 1) to defendant 2, claiming the disputed land was her exclusive Stridhan property acquired via a 1998 gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor and determined the balance of convenience favored her, concluding the property faced danger of alienation. Accordingly, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo and prohibited any alienation or sale of the disputed property without court permission until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts