Smt. Bindu Devi W/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh vs Shri Manish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh and Ors. — 4/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.

Issues Next hearing 25-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: BRPA520000062022

Filing Number

6/2022

Filing Date

21-Jan-2022

Registration No

4/2022

Registration Date

21-Jan-2022

Court

Paliganj Civil Division

Judge

2-Civil Judge Sr. Div

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Bindu Devi W/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh

    Adv. Rana Ranjit Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri Manish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh and Ors.

Case History

  1. 25-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  3. 03-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  6. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  7. 19-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  8. 10-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  9. 28-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  10. 18-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  11. 27-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  12. 03-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  13. 18-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  14. 11-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  15. 14-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  16. 05-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  17. 26-Jul-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Order Summary: The Court of Sub-Judge, Paliganj granted an interim injunction petition (dated 26/07/2024) in Title Suit Case No. 04/2022. The plaintiff challenged a 2021 sale deed executed by her son (defendant 1) to defendant 2, claiming the disputed land was her exclusive Stridhan property acquired via a 1998 gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor and determined the balance of convenience favored her, concluding the property faced danger of alienation. Accordingly, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo and prohibited any alienation or sale of the disputed property without court permission until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 26-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  19. 27-Jun-2024

    Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  20. 22-May-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  21. 19-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  22. 14-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  23. 09-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  24. 09-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  25. 04-Jan-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  26. 09-Oct-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  27. 18-Jul-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  28. 18-May-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  29. 06-Mar-2023

    Seristedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  30. 12-Dec-2022

    Seristedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  31. 22-Sep-2022

    Seristedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  32. 11-Aug-2022

    Seristedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  33. 07-Jun-2022

    Seristedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  34. 07-Apr-2022

    Seristedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div

  35. 22-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 21-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Order Summary: The Court of Sub-Judge, Paliganj granted an interim injunction petition (dated 26/07/2024) in Title Suit Case No. 04/2022. The plaintiff challenged a 2021 sale deed executed by her son (defendant 1) to defendant 2, claiming the disputed land was her exclusive Stridhan property acquired via a 1998 gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor and determined the balance of convenience favored her, concluding the property faced danger of alienation. Accordingly, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo and prohibited any alienation or sale of the disputed property without court permission until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case