Smt. Bindu Devi W/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh vs Shri Manish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh and Ors. — 4/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: BRPA520000062022

ISSUES

Next Hearing

25th April 2026

Filing Number

6/2022

Filing Date

21-01-2022

Registration No

4/2022

Registration Date

21-01-2022

Court

Paliganj Civil Division

Judge

2-Civil Judge Sr. Div

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Bindu Devi W/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh

Adv. Rana Ranjit Kumar

Respondent(s)

Shri Manish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Dhir Bijay Singh and Ors.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Civil Judge Sr. Div

06-03-2026

ISSUES

03-03-2026

ISSUES

06-01-2026

ISSUES

14-10-2025

ISSUES

26-08-2025

ISSUES

Interim Orders

26-07-2024
Order

Order Summary: The Court of Sub-Judge, Paliganj granted an interim injunction petition (dated 26/07/2024) in Title Suit Case No. 04/2022. The plaintiff challenged a 2021 sale deed executed by her son (defendant 1) to defendant 2, claiming the disputed land was her exclusive Stridhan property acquired via a 1998 gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor and determined the balance of convenience favored her, concluding the property faced danger of alienation. Accordingly, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo and prohibited any alienation or sale of the disputed property without court permission until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Order Summary: The Court of Sub-Judge, Paliganj granted an interim injunction petition (dated 26/07/2024) in Title Suit Case No. 04/2022. The plaintiff challenged a 2021 sale deed executed by her son (defendant 1) to defendant 2, claiming the disputed land was her exclusive Stridhan property acquired via a 1998 gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor and determined the balance of convenience favored her, concluding the property faced danger of alienation. Accordingly, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo and prohibited any alienation or sale of the disputed property without court permission until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Paliganj Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case