SANTOSH KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate — 620/2025

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A,26,27. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA400011832025

Filing Number

1113/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

620/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

Masaurhi DJ Division

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

585

Police Station

DHANARUA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A,26,27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KUMAR

    Adv. Ajit Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge Court at Masaurhi, Patna rejected Santosh Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving illegal firearms (Arms Act violations). The court found that a revolver was recovered from the accused's house, witnesses corroborated the prosecution's case, and since investigation was ongoing, bail could not be granted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 620/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge Court at Masaurhi, Patna rejected Santosh Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving illegal firearms (Arms Act violations). The court found that a revolver was recovered from the accused's house, witnesses corroborated the prosecution's case, and since investigation was ongoing, bail could not be granted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case