LALI YADAV AND ORS vs State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate — 617/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),126(2),308(2),303(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA400011792025

Filing Number

1109/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

617/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

Masaurhi DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),126(2),308(2),303(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALI YADAV AND ORS

    Adv. VIBHUTI KUMAR VATS

  2. 2.KARU YADAV

  3. 3.SAKALDEO YADAV

  4. 4.SOHRAI YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Lali Yadav, Karu Yadav, Sakal Dev Yadav, and Sohrai Yadav, who were accused of extortion, criminal intimidation, and theft in connection with a Rangdari (protection money) demand case. The court found that the petitioners were habitual offenders with multiple similar criminal cases pending against them, making them unsuitable for anticipatory bail relief. The petitioners were directed to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which would be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 617/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Lali Yadav, Karu Yadav, Sakal Dev Yadav, and Sohrai Yadav, who were accused of extortion, criminal intimidation, and theft in connection with a Rangdari (protection money) demand case. The court found that the petitioners were habitual offenders with multiple similar criminal cases pending against them, making them unsuitable for anticipatory bail relief. The petitioners were directed to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which would be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case