RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS PINTU SINGH vs State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate — 81/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,118(2),126(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA400001412026

Filing Number

116/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

81/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

Masaurhi DJ Division

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

MASAURHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,118(2),126(2),3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS PINTU SINGH

    Adv. GAUTAM KUAMR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Rakesh Kumar @ Pintu Singh, who is accused in a shooting case where two persons were injured. The court found that witness statements from the injured victims and recovered cartridge evidence supported the prosecution's case, and since the investigation was ongoing, bail at this stage was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Rakesh Kumar @ Pintu Singh, who is accused in a shooting case where two persons were injured. The court found that witness statements from the injured victims and recovered cartridge evidence supported the prosecution's case, and since the investigation was ongoing, bail at this stage was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case