SURAJ KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate — 29/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),117(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA400001402026

Filing Number

115/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

Masaurhi DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),117(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ KUMAR

    Adv. VIBHUTI KUMAR VATS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed Suraj Kumar's bail petition in a case involving charges of attempted murder and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 326(2), 352, 115(2), 351(2), 109, and 117(2). Despite prosecution evidence including witness statements, a confessional statement, and injury reports documenting neck injuries from a sharp instrument, the judge granted bail considering the petitioner's clean criminal record, prolonged custody since November 2025, and the time elapsed. The petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Suraj Kumar's bail petition in a case involving charges of attempted murder and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 326(2), 352, 115(2), 351(2), 109, and 117(2). Despite prosecution evidence including witness statements, a confessional statement, and injury reports documenting neck injuries from a sharp instrument, the judge granted bail considering the petitioner's clean criminal record, prolonged custody since November 2025, and the time elapsed. The petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case