ROHIT KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate — 26/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),117(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA400000342026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

Masaurhi DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

PIPRA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),117(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR

    Adv. LOKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Rohit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving an alleged attack with sharp weapons on the neck of victim Ranjan Kumar on 01.01.2026. The court found that despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and arguments that charges were bailable, the serious nature of the injury—a sharp weapon wound to the neck, a vital body part requiring 16 stitches—warranted denial of bail, supported by witness testimony and a confessional statement from co-accused Suraj Kumar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Rohit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving an alleged attack with sharp weapons on the neck of victim Ranjan Kumar on 01.01.2026. The court found that despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and arguments that charges were bailable, the serious nature of the injury—a sharp weapon wound to the neck, a vital body part requiring 16 stitches—warranted denial of bail, supported by witness testimony and a confessional statement from co-accused Suraj Kumar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case