Dharmendra Sao vs The State of Bihar — 854/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRPA300039542025

Filing Number

854/2025

Filing Date

12-Dec-2025

Registration No

854/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmendra Sao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision, upholding the lower court's cognizance order against Sumitra Devi under Section 318(1) BNS while dropping proceedings against co-accused Bhushan Prasad and in-laws. The court found the magistrate properly exercised discretion based on available evidence, holding that allegations of illicit relations and general assault allegations lacked specific criminal material against other accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 854/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision, upholding the lower court's cognizance order against Sumitra Devi under Section 318(1) BNS while dropping proceedings against co-accused Bhushan Prasad and in-laws. The court found the magistrate properly exercised discretion based on available evidence, holding that allegations of illicit relations and general assault allegations lacked specific criminal material against other accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case