Raushan Kumar Alies Kari Lal vs State of Bihar — 238/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(2),331(4),109(1),351(3),303(2),308(4),76. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300006292026

Filing Number

582/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

238/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

MOKAMAH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(2),331(4),109(1),351(3),303(2),308(4),76
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raushan Kumar Alies Kari Lal

    Adv. RAVI PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 238/2026 Raushan Kumar (Kari Lal) v. State of Bihar The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding the charges under IPC sections 140(2), 331(4), 109(1), 76, and 303(2) to be non-cognizable and bailable in nature. The court noted significant discrepancies in the prosecution's case diary—including conflicting witness statements about alleged gunfire and no recovery of weapons—determining the evidence was insufficient to support the serious allegations of extortion, criminal intimidation, and attempted murder. The petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 238/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 238/2026 Raushan Kumar (Kari Lal) v. State of Bihar The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding the charges under IPC sections 140(2), 331(4), 109(1), 76, and 303(2) to be non-cognizable and bailable in nature. The court noted significant discrepancies in the prosecution's case diary—including conflicting witness statements about alleged gunfire and no recovery of weapons—determining the evidence was insufficient to support the serious allegations of extortion, criminal intimidation, and attempted murder. The petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case