Manish Kumar Alias Karu and 02 others vs State of Bihar — 227/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300006112026

Filing Number

569/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

227/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),303(2),3(5)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manish Kumar Alias Karu and 02 others

    Adv. RAVI PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to three accused (Manish Kumar, Monu Kumar, and Sanjay Singh) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous injury under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, Section 109(1) charges were not substantiated, Section 303(2) was not attracted, and the accused had no criminal history, resided in the same village, and were willing to provide surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to three accused (Manish Kumar, Monu Kumar, and Sanjay Singh) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous injury under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, Section 109(1) charges were not substantiated, Section 303(2) was not attracted, and the accused had no criminal history, resided in the same village, and were willing to provide surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case