Rajnish Kumar vs State of Bihar — 226/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 149,307,336,188. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300006102026

Filing Number

568/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

226/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 149,307,336,188
Arms Act Section 25(9)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajnish Kumar

    Adv. CHANDRA SEKHAR PRASAD SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Summary The District and Session Court, Barauni (Bihar) granted bail to accused Rajnish Kumar in FIR No. 138/2021 under charges of communal violence and illegal firearms use during post-election celebrations. The court found that there was insufficient evidence of actual injury, no weapon wounds discovered, no eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, and similar co-accused had already been granted bail; therefore, bail was granted with a bond of ₹10,000 and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 226/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The District and Session Court, Barauni (Bihar) granted bail to accused Rajnish Kumar in FIR No. 138/2021 under charges of communal violence and illegal firearms use during post-election celebrations. The court found that there was insufficient evidence of actual injury, no weapon wounds discovered, no eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, and similar co-accused had already been granted bail; therefore, bail was granted with a bond of ₹10,000 and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case