Lallu Mahto and 02 others vs State of Bihar — 218/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300005532026

Filing Number

557/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

218/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

BHADOR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,351(2),352,3(5)
Arms Act Section 27
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lallu Mahto and 02 others

    Adv. Rohit Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Lallu Mahto, Swarth Mahto, and Yogendra Mahto in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5), and the Arms Act. While the defense argued the charges were fabricated and that the accused had no criminal history, the court found the allegations serious—involving attack with a sword/stick and gunfire causing multiple head injuries to the informant requiring hospitalization. The court determined that at this stage, interim bail was not warranted given the gravity of injuries documented and the nature of the charges still under investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 05-May-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  9. 09-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  10. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  11. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  13. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 218/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Lallu Mahto, Swarth Mahto, and Yogendra Mahto in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5), and the Arms Act. While the defense argued the charges were fabricated and that the accused had no criminal history, the court found the allegations serious—involving attack with a sword/stick and gunfire causing multiple head injuries to the informant requiring hospitalization. The court determined that at this stage, interim bail was not warranted given the gravity of injuries documented and the nature of the charges still under investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case