Sumit Kumar Alias Jelar vs State of Bihar — 118/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA300004572026

Filing Number

505/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

167

Police Station

PANDARAK

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sumit Kumar Alias Jelar

    Adv. Shashi Kant

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court, Bade, granted conditional bail to the applicant Sumit Kumar on March 24, 2026, in a firearms case (FIR No. 167/2025) under the Arms Act. The court found that while the applicant was arrested with an unlicensed country-made pistol, he did not have conscious possession of the weapon—it was recovered from his co-accused Sanjay Yadav—and there was insufficient direct evidence linking him to the alleged armed conspiracy. The applicant was released on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to his cooperation with the investigation and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court, Bade, granted conditional bail to the applicant Sumit Kumar on March 24, 2026, in a firearms case (FIR No. 167/2025) under the Arms Act. The court found that while the applicant was arrested with an unlicensed country-made pistol, he did not have conscious possession of the weapon—it was recovered from his co-accused Sanjay Yadav—and there was insufficient direct evidence linking him to the alleged armed conspiracy. The applicant was released on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to his cooperation with the investigation and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case