Ajay Manjhi and 02 others vs State of Bihar — 195/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),329(2),109(1),325,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA300004522026
Filing Number
500/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
195/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Barh DJ Division
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
Pachmahala
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajay Manjhi and 02 others
Adv. VINAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ajay Manjhi, Ghola Manjhi, and Badal Manjhi, who were accused of assaulting the informant and his family members with weapons causing head injuries during a loan dispute on 14/01/2026. The court found direct and specific allegations supported by injury reports and witness statements in the case diary, and considering the nature, gravity, and seriousness of the accusations, declined to grant anticipatory bail privilege to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ajay Manjhi, Ghola Manjhi, and Badal Manjhi, who were accused of assaulting the informant and his family members with weapons causing head injuries during a loan dispute on 14/01/2026. The court found direct and specific allegations supported by injury reports and witness statements in the case diary, and considering the nature, gravity, and seriousness of the accusations, declined to grant anticipatory bail privilege to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts