Ajay Manjhi and 02 others vs State of Bihar — 195/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),329(2),109(1),325,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300004522026

Filing Number

500/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

Pachmahala

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),329(2),109(1),325,351(2),351(3),3(5)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajay Manjhi and 02 others

    Adv. VINAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ajay Manjhi, Ghola Manjhi, and Badal Manjhi, who were accused of assaulting the informant and his family members with weapons causing head injuries during a loan dispute on 14/01/2026. The court found direct and specific allegations supported by injury reports and witness statements in the case diary, and considering the nature, gravity, and seriousness of the accusations, declined to grant anticipatory bail privilege to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ajay Manjhi, Ghola Manjhi, and Badal Manjhi, who were accused of assaulting the informant and his family members with weapons causing head injuries during a loan dispute on 14/01/2026. The court found direct and specific allegations supported by injury reports and witness statements in the case diary, and considering the nature, gravity, and seriousness of the accusations, declined to grant anticipatory bail privilege to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case