Rakesh Kumar vs State of Bihar — 115/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)a,26,35. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA300004462026

Filing Number

496/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

115/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-B)a,26,35
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Kumar

    Adv. Anand Gaurav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to accused Rakesh Kumar in a weapons case (FIR No. 01/2026 under Arms Act Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26, 35) filed at Mokama Police Station, finding the charges to be false and fabricated. The court determined that the evidence against him—including a country-made pistol and ammunition allegedly recovered from his possession—was planted as part of a politically motivated conspiracy involving police collusion, and noted his clean criminal history and pre-arrest judicial custody since January 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 115/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Rakesh Kumar in a weapons case (FIR No. 01/2026 under Arms Act Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26, 35) filed at Mokama Police Station, finding the charges to be false and fabricated. The court determined that the evidence against him—including a country-made pistol and ammunition allegedly recovered from his possession—was planted as part of a politically motivated conspiracy involving police collusion, and noted his clean criminal history and pre-arrest judicial custody since January 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case