Raj Kumar vs State of Bihar — 88/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA300003012026

Filing Number

422/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

196

Police Station

MOKAMAH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(2),3(5)
Arms Act Section 27
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raj Kumar

    Adv. SAMENDRA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail application of the accused Raj Kumar in a murder case (FIR No. 196/2025 under IPC Sections 103(2) and 3(5), and Arms Act Section 27). The court found, based on forensic evidence, autopsy reports, and witness statements in the case file, that the death was caused by severe beatings resulting in internal hemorrhaging, and that the accused's involvement was clearly established. Given the grave nature of the offense and the accused's culpability, the court deemed it inappropriate to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-V

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail application of the accused Raj Kumar in a murder case (FIR No. 196/2025 under IPC Sections 103(2) and 3(5), and Arms Act Section 27). The court found, based on forensic evidence, autopsy reports, and witness statements in the case file, that the death was caused by severe beatings resulting in internal hemorrhaging, and that the accused's involvement was clearly established. Given the grave nature of the offense and the accused's culpability, the court deemed it inappropriate to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case