Prashuram Singh and other vs State of Bihar — 144/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,324. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300002962026

Filing Number

417/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

144/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,324
Arms Act Section 27
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prashuram Singh and other

    Adv. SHAMBHU YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The District and Sessions Court at Buxar rejected the bail application (No. 144/2026) of accused Parshuram Singh and Nanhkuyu Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and Arms Act section 27. The court found credible evidence that the accused fired gunshots at the informant and assaulted him with a rod, causing serious injuries and theft of his motorcycle and valuables, and therefore declined to grant bail as the gravity of offenses and circumstances did not warrant interim release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District and Sessions Court at Buxar rejected the bail application (No. 144/2026) of accused Parshuram Singh and Nanhkuyu Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and Arms Act section 27. The court found credible evidence that the accused fired gunshots at the informant and assaulted him with a rod, causing serious injuries and theft of his motorcycle and valuables, and therefore declined to grant bail as the gravity of offenses and circumstances did not warrant interim release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case