Munna Singh Alias Raj Kumar Alias Nana Kumar and 03 others vs State of Bihar — 141/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300002932026

Filing Number

414/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

141/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,109,3(5)
Arms Act Section 27
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Munna Singh Alias Raj Kumar Alias Nana Kumar and 03 others

    Adv. Sourav Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application filed by four accused persons (Munna Singh, Sanjit Kumar, Mukesh Singh, and Karu Singh) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 109, 3(5) BNS and Arms Act Section 27, relating to an alleged shooting incident on 11-10-2025. The court found sufficient evidence in the FIR, witness statements, and injury reports to support the serious nature of the charges, determining that bail was not warranted at this stage of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 141/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application filed by four accused persons (Munna Singh, Sanjit Kumar, Mukesh Singh, and Karu Singh) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 109, 3(5) BNS and Arms Act Section 27, relating to an alleged shooting incident on 11-10-2025. The court found sufficient evidence in the FIR, witness statements, and injury reports to support the serious nature of the charges, determining that bail was not warranted at this stage of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case