Jugal Yadav Alias Jugal Prasad Alias Jugas Gope and 03 others vs State of Bihar — 138/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,,126(2),115(2),351. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300002892026

Filing Number

410/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,,126(2),115(2),351
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jugal Yadav Alias Jugal Prasad Alias Jugas Gope and 03 others

    Adv. VIJAY SHANKAR PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by four accused persons in a case involving charges under IPC sections 137(2), 96, 126(2), 115(2), and 351 related to the wrongful abduction of a 13-year-old girl. The court found credible evidence that the accused, in conspiracy with each other, unlawfully took away the minor girl, and the serious nature of the offense, combined with the victim remaining missing despite extensive searches, made bail inappropriate. Accordingly, the bail petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by four accused persons in a case involving charges under IPC sections 137(2), 96, 126(2), 115(2), and 351 related to the wrongful abduction of a 13-year-old girl. The court found credible evidence that the accused, in conspiracy with each other, unlawfully took away the minor girl, and the serious nature of the offense, combined with the victim remaining missing despite extensive searches, made bail inappropriate. Accordingly, the bail petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case