Nidhi Alias Kriti Singh vs State of Bihar — 132/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,467,468,471,120B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA300002712026
Filing Number
398/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
132/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
Barh DJ Division
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nidhi Alias Kriti Singh
Adv. MANOJ KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant Nidhi Urf Kriti Singh in a fraud case (IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B) involving unauthorized loan applications and unauthorized deductions from a complainant's bank account totaling ₹2,331. The court found the applicant was merely an employee at the establishment and had no direct involvement in the fraudulent scheme, which was primarily orchestrated by the main accused Rahul Kumar who had already been granted bail in a related case. The applicant was ordered to furnish bail bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and surrender within 30 days, subject to conditions under CrPC Section 438(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 132/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant Nidhi Urf Kriti Singh in a fraud case (IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B) involving unauthorized loan applications and unauthorized deductions from a complainant's bank account totaling ₹2,331. The court found the applicant was merely an employee at the establishment and had no direct involvement in the fraudulent scheme, which was primarily orchestrated by the main accused Rahul Kumar who had already been granted bail in a related case. The applicant was ordered to furnish bail bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and surrender within 30 days, subject to conditions under CrPC Section 438(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts