Dheeraj Kumar vs State of Bihar — 112/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA300002152026
Filing Number
363/2026
Filing Date
31-01-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Court
Barh DJ Division
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dheeraj Kumar
Adv. Anand Gaurav
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dheeraj Kumar (19 years old) in connection with Mokama P.S Case No. 483 of 2025, involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), and 352. The court found credible and specific allegations that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, abused and assaulted the informant Rohit Kumar with fist and lathi, causing injuries including a vital head injury (right parietal scalp), and considered the gravity and seriousness of the offense and nature of allegations to deny the anticipatory bail privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dheeraj Kumar (19 years old) in connection with Mokama P.S Case No. 483 of 2025, involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), and 352. The court found credible and specific allegations that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, abused and assaulted the informant Rohit Kumar with fist and lathi, causing injuries including a vital head injury (right parietal scalp), and considered the gravity and seriousness of the offense and nature of allegations to deny the anticipatory bail privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts