Dheeraj Kumar vs State of Bihar — 112/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300002152026

Filing Number

363/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,3(5)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dheeraj Kumar

    Adv. Anand Gaurav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dheeraj Kumar (19 years old) in connection with Mokama P.S Case No. 483 of 2025, involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), and 352. The court found credible and specific allegations that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, abused and assaulted the informant Rohit Kumar with fist and lathi, causing injuries including a vital head injury (right parietal scalp), and considered the gravity and seriousness of the offense and nature of allegations to deny the anticipatory bail privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court, Barh (Patna) rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dheeraj Kumar (19 years old) in connection with Mokama P.S Case No. 483 of 2025, involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), and 352. The court found credible and specific allegations that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, abused and assaulted the informant Rohit Kumar with fist and lathi, causing injuries including a vital head injury (right parietal scalp), and considered the gravity and seriousness of the offense and nature of allegations to deny the anticipatory bail privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case