Nitish Kumar vs State of Bihar — 33/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,379,307,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA300001102026
Filing Number
281/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Court
Barh DJ Division
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
209
Police Station
BAKHTIARPUR
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nitish Kumar
Adv. RANVIJAY SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court rejected the bail application of accused Neetish Kumar in case FIR No. 209/2020 under IPC sections 326, 379, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27, finding that the victim's eyewitness account and medical evidence corroborate the shooting incident, and considering the accused's criminal history, bail was deemed inappropriate. The court dismissed the regular bail petition, holding that the accused does not deserve the benefit of bail given the factual circumstances and criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2026
The court rejected the bail application of accused Neetish Kumar in case FIR No. 209/2020 under IPC sections 326, 379, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27, finding that the victim's eyewitness account and medical evidence corroborate the shooting incident, and considering the accused's criminal history, bail was deemed inappropriate. The court dismissed the regular bail petition, holding that the accused does not deserve the benefit of bail given the factual circumstances and criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts