RAMSWARATH SINGH vs RAMWARAN RAI AND OTHERS — 417/2000
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,307,379,427,435,323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRPA300000602000
Filing Number
417/2000
Filing Date
13-Apr-2000
Registration No
417/2000
Registration Date
13-Apr-2000
Court
Barh DJ Division
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
ATHMAL GOLA
Year
1998
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMSWARATH SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMWARAN RAI AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgment
Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, Bade (Bihar) acquitted eleven accused persons in case no. 417/2000 dated March 18, 2026, regarding charges under IPC sections 307/149, 379, 435/149, 147, 148, 323, and the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient evidence—only one witness was produced who denied knowledge of the incident, and critical witnesses including investigators and medical officers were not examined. The accused were acquitted and discharged of all charges, being given the benefit of doubt as the allegations could not be established through adequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Jul-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
30-Jun-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Jun-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
31-May-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-May-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
09-May-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
26-Apr-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
25-Mar-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
01-Aug-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
17-May-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
22-Feb-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
16-Jan-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
01-Dec-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
26-Sep-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
02-Aug-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
07-Jun-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
12-Apr-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
09-Feb-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
15-Dec-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
19-Oct-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
20-Aug-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
29-Jun-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
07-May-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
10-Mar-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
13-Jan-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
18-Nov-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
01-Sep-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
13-Jul-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
15-Jun-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
12-May-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
13-Apr-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
15-Mar-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
02-Feb-2021
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
09-Dec-2020
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV
-
05-Oct-2020
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
14-Aug-2020
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
23-Jun-2020
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
27-May-2020
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
11-May-2020
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
27-Mar-2020
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III
-
25-Jan-2020
Evidence
Assistant Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2019
Evidence
Assistant Sessions Judge
-
14-Oct-2019
Evidence
Assistant Sessions Judge
-
17-Aug-2019
Evidence
Assistant Sessions Judge
-
16-Jul-2019
Evidence
Assistant Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2019
Evidence
Assistant Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Apr-2000
Case filed
Registration No. 417/2000
Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, Bade (Bihar) acquitted eleven accused persons in case no. 417/2000 dated March 18, 2026, regarding charges under IPC sections 307/149, 379, 435/149, 147, 148, 323, and the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient evidence—only one witness was produced who denied knowledge of the incident, and critical witnesses including investigators and medical officers were not examined. The accused were acquitted and discharged of all charges, being given the benefit of doubt as the allegations could not be established through adequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts