Vishal Kumar Alias Badal vs State of Bihar — 16/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366(A),34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA300000352026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

216/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

Barh DJ Division

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

122

Police Station

PANDARAK

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 366(A),34
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Vishal Kumar Alias Badal

Adv. BIJENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

ORDER

12-03-2026

ORDER

09-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order

Case Summary The court rejected the accused Vishal Kumar's anticipatory bail application under Section 366(A) IPC (abduction of a minor for marriage). Despite the accused's argument that the victim went willingly and they now live together with a child, the court found credible evidence showing the victim was a minor (16 years old) who was abducted and married without legal validity. The court dismissed the bail application, finding the offense serious and the accused's absence from court proceedings concerning, thereby rejecting the settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court rejected the accused Vishal Kumar's anticipatory bail application under Section 366(A) IPC (abduction of a minor for marriage). Despite the accused's argument that the victim went willingly and they now live together with a child, the court found credible evidence showing the victim was a minor (16 years old) who was abducted and married without legal validity. The court dismissed the bail application, finding the offense serious and the accused's absence from court proceedings concerning, thereby rejecting the settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Barh DJ Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case