Rahul Kumar alias Jhunnu vs State of Bihar — 460/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200013262026

Filing Number

1204/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

460/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

6-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

470

Police Station

Complaint Private

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Kumar alias Jhunnu

    Adv. Nabab Lal Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rahul Kumar, accused of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and attempt to murder under IPC Sections 85, 3(5) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act 1961. The court found the charges grave based on allegations that the accused burned the petitioner's wife with kerosene oil and demanded a motorcycle as dowry, and dismissed the bail plea accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  8. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 460/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rahul Kumar, accused of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and attempt to murder under IPC Sections 85, 3(5) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act 1961. The court found the charges grave based on allegations that the accused burned the petitioner's wife with kerosene oil and demanded a motorcycle as dowry, and dismissed the bail plea accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case