Ajay Kumar and others vs State of Bihar — 458/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),74,351(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA200013242026
Filing Number
1202/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
458/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
1-District and Additional Session Judge-I
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
BIKRAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajay Kumar and others
Adv. Sanjay Kumar
-
2.Mantu Chauhan
-
3.Hare Ram Kumar
-
4.Shri Ram Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 458/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajay Kumar and Hare Ram Kumar in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty, assault, and theft related to a rice crop dispute. The judge found that the investigating officer failed to produce the case diary despite six weeks having elapsed—well beyond the Supreme Court's directive to dispose anticipatory bail petitions within six weeks—and concluded no material had been collected against the petitioners. The court released them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, noting the case appeared to be a counter-blast to an earlier case filed by the petitioner's mother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 458/2026
Summary of Case 458/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajay Kumar and Hare Ram Kumar in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty, assault, and theft related to a rice crop dispute. The judge found that the investigating officer failed to produce the case diary despite six weeks having elapsed—well beyond the Supreme Court's directive to dispose anticipatory bail petitions within six weeks—and concluded no material had been collected against the petitioners. The court released them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, noting the case appeared to be a counter-blast to an earlier case filed by the petitioner's mother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts