Gautam Kumar vs State of Bihar — 442/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),75,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA200013012026
Filing Number
1182/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
442/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
6-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
363
Police Station
NAUBATPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gautam Kumar
Adv. MANORANJAN PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Copy of Order
The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of applicant Gautam Kumar (Case No. 442/2026, related to FIR 363/2025, Naubatpur Police Station) without merit due to the applicant's lack of interest in the proceedings. The court found that the applicant's advocate repeatedly failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates for hearing the bail application, indicating abandonment of the case, and therefore rejected the application without going into the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
-
25-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 442/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of applicant Gautam Kumar (Case No. 442/2026, related to FIR 363/2025, Naubatpur Police Station) without merit due to the applicant's lack of interest in the proceedings. The court found that the applicant's advocate repeatedly failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates for hearing the bail application, indicating abandonment of the case, and therefore rejected the application without going into the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts