Sangeeta Devi vs State of Bihar — 409/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200012192026

Filing Number

1115/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

409/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

87

Police Station

KHAGAUL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sangeeta Devi

    Adv. Nabab Lal Yadav

  2. 2.Sunita Devi

  3. 3.Ramesh Kumar

  4. 4.Sheo raj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners (Sangeeta Devi, Sunita Devi, Ramesh Kumar, and Sheo Raj) in a case involving allegations of assault arising from a property dispute. The court found a prima facie case against the petitioners based on specific allegations of their participation in the assault that caused head injuries to the informant and her son, and noted that investigation was still in progress. The court rejected the parity argument with co-accused Satan Ray, holding that regular bail and anticipatory bail are governed by distinct considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Order

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 409/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners (Sangeeta Devi, Sunita Devi, Ramesh Kumar, and Sheo Raj) in a case involving allegations of assault arising from a property dispute. The court found a prima facie case against the petitioners based on specific allegations of their participation in the assault that caused head injuries to the informant and her son, and noted that investigation was still in progress. The court rejected the parity argument with co-accused Satan Ray, holding that regular bail and anticipatory bail are governed by distinct considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case