Arjun Kumar vs State of Bihar — 258/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,411. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA200011692026

Filing Number

1071/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

1-District and Additional Session Judge-I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392,411

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arjun Kumar

    Adv. RAJIV RANJAN SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Arjun Kumar's bail petition in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) despite an earlier High Court order granting bail. The court found that Kumar concealed his prior criminal case (Danapur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2017) from the High Court, and evidence recovered from his possession (mobile phone) linked him to the armed robbery of jewelry and valuables. The court held that Kumar's non-disclosure of criminal antecedents and the serious nature of the offense warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Session Judge-I

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 258/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Arjun Kumar's bail petition in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) despite an earlier High Court order granting bail. The court found that Kumar concealed his prior criminal case (Danapur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2017) from the High Court, and evidence recovered from his possession (mobile phone) linked him to the armed robbery of jewelry and valuables. The court held that Kumar's non-disclosure of criminal antecedents and the serious nature of the offense warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case