Md. Fasil KV and others vs The State of Bihar and others — 55/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Miscellaneous - Criminal Miscellaneous

CNR: BRPA200011602026

Filing Number

55/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md. Fasil KV and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Danapur rejected the petition filed by Md. Fasil K.V. and Md. Shamir MT seeking modification of their bail order dated 11/02/2026. The court found that the original bail order was decided on merit after examining all materials on record and saw no grounds to modify the conditions requiring a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, despite the petitioners' argument that they remained in custody due to this condition and prolonged investigation involving 11 accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Danapur rejected the petition filed by Md. Fasil K.V. and Md. Shamir MT seeking modification of their bail order dated 11/02/2026. The court found that the original bail order was decided on merit after examining all materials on record and saw no grounds to modify the conditions requiring a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, despite the petitioners' argument that they remained in custody due to this condition and prolonged investigation involving 11 accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case