Md. Fasil KV and others vs The State of Bihar and others — 55/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.
Cr. Miscellaneous - Criminal Miscellaneous
CNR: BRPA200011602026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
55/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Petitioner(s)
Md. Fasil KV and others
Respondent(s)
The State of Bihar and others
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Court, Danapur rejected the petition filed by Md. Fasil K.V. and Md. Shamir MT seeking modification of their bail order dated 11/02/2026. The court found that the original bail order was decided on merit after examining all materials on record and saw no grounds to modify the conditions requiring a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, despite the petitioners' argument that they remained in custody due to this condition and prolonged investigation involving 11 accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Court, Danapur rejected the petition filed by Md. Fasil K.V. and Md. Shamir MT seeking modification of their bail order dated 11/02/2026. The court found that the original bail order was decided on merit after examining all materials on record and saw no grounds to modify the conditions requiring a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, despite the petitioners' argument that they remained in custody due to this condition and prolonged investigation involving 11 accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts