Pankaj Kumar and others vs State of Bihar — 371/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),308(2),329(3),351(3),352,111(7). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200011532026

Filing Number

1061/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

371/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

DANAPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),308(2),329(3),351(3),352,111(7)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pankaj Kumar and others

    Adv. MD FIRAQUE ALI

  2. 2.Niraj Kumar alias Guddu

  3. 3.Warij Kumar

  4. 4.Nikhil Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners accused of criminal intimidation, unlawful assembly with deadly weapons, and threatening tenants over a disputed land plot. The court found the charges serious, noted that three petitioners have ten pending criminal cases, and held that the underlying land dispute does not diminish the criminality of the allegations, warranting denial of pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 371/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners accused of criminal intimidation, unlawful assembly with deadly weapons, and threatening tenants over a disputed land plot. The court found the charges serious, noted that three petitioners have ten pending criminal cases, and held that the underlying land dispute does not diminish the criminality of the allegations, warranting denial of pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case