Kishan Manjhi and other vs State of Bihar — 367/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,342,448,427,436,354,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200011282026

Filing Number

1036/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

367/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

215

Police Station

RANIA TALAB

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,342,448,427,436,354,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kishan Manjhi and other

    Adv. Sudhir Kumar

  2. 2.Raja Manjhi Alias Raja Hindustani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Kishan Manjhi and Raja Manjhi) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, wrongful confinement, house-breaking, mischief, and arson. The court found that the matter had been compromised between parties, co-accused were similarly granted bail, and there were no direct allegations, leading to the conclusion the case stood on similar footing as prior bail grants. The petitioners were ordered released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, conditioned under applicable criminal procedure rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Kishan Manjhi and Raja Manjhi) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, wrongful confinement, house-breaking, mischief, and arson. The court found that the matter had been compromised between parties, co-accused were similarly granted bail, and there were no direct allegations, leading to the conclusion the case stood on similar footing as prior bail grants. The petitioners were ordered released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, conditioned under applicable criminal procedure rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case