Pinku Kumar vs State of Bihar — 234/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),118(2),109,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA200010722026

Case disposed

Filing Number

980/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

234/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

SHAHPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),118(2),109,351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

Pinku Kumar

Adv. Nitish Kumar

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

13-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

HEARING

01-04-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Danapur granted bail to Pinku Kumar in a case involving allegations of assault and restraint under various IPC sections. The court held that despite specific charges against the petitioner, bail was warranted because the investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, the petitioner had been in custody since January 2, 2026, and no further custodial interrogation was necessary—applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception. The petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties and strict conditions including trial cooperation, non-tampering with evidence, and maintenance of good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Danapur granted bail to Pinku Kumar in a case involving allegations of assault and restraint under various IPC sections. The court held that despite specific charges against the petitioner, bail was warranted because the investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, the petitioner had been in custody since January 2, 2026, and no further custodial interrogation was necessary—applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception. The petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties and strict conditions including trial cooperation, non-tampering with evidence, and maintenance of good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Danapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case