Pinku Kumar vs State of Bihar — 234/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),118(2),109,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA200010722026
Filing Number
980/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
234/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
01
Police Station
SHAHPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pinku Kumar
Adv. Nitish Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Danapur granted bail to Pinku Kumar in a case involving allegations of assault and restraint under various IPC sections. The court held that despite specific charges against the petitioner, bail was warranted because the investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, the petitioner had been in custody since January 2, 2026, and no further custodial interrogation was necessary—applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception. The petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties and strict conditions including trial cooperation, non-tampering with evidence, and maintenance of good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Danapur granted bail to Pinku Kumar in a case involving allegations of assault and restraint under various IPC sections. The court held that despite specific charges against the petitioner, bail was warranted because the investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, the petitioner had been in custody since January 2, 2026, and no further custodial interrogation was necessary—applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception. The petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties and strict conditions including trial cooperation, non-tampering with evidence, and maintenance of good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts