Kashi Rai alias Ajay Kumar vs State of Bihar — 344/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,324,307. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200010522026

Filing Number

963/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

344/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,324,307

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kashi Rai alias Ajay Kumar

    Adv. Jitendra Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Kash Rai @ Ajay Kumar as it was a successive second application, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in G.R. Ananda Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu that such applications are not maintainable. The court directed the petitioner to surrender before the lower court within 15 days and barred him from filing any further anticipatory bail applications in connection with the Bihta P.S. case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, and 307. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 344/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Kash Rai @ Ajay Kumar as it was a successive second application, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in G.R. Ananda Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu that such applications are not maintainable. The court directed the petitioner to surrender before the lower court within 15 days and barred him from filing any further anticipatory bail applications in connection with the Bihta P.S. case involving charges under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, and 307. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case