Shankar Shah vs State of Bihar — 215/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA200010242026

Filing Number

935/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

743

Police Station

MANER

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shankar Shah

    Adv. Sudhir Kumar Vidyarthi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

    The court rejected the bail application of 70-year-old Shankar Sah, accused under Section 140(3) BNS 2023 (grave offense), finding prima facie materials suggesting his possible involvement with premises where the alleged missing victim was located. The court held that despite his age and claim of innocence, the serious nature of accusations and connection to the victim's location warrant continued judicial custody, though he may apply afresh after charge-sheet filing or material change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of 70-year-old Shankar Sah, accused under Section 140(3) BNS 2023 (grave offense), finding prima facie materials suggesting his possible involvement with premises where the alleged missing victim was located. The court held that despite his age and claim of innocence, the serious nature of accusations and connection to the victim's location warrant continued judicial custody, though he may apply afresh after charge-sheet filing or material change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case