Vivek Mishra vs State of Bihar — 191/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),306,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA200009682026
Filing Number
888/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
191/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
179
Police Station
Neura
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vivek Mishra
Adv. Advocate
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur granted bail to Vivek Mishra (24 years old) in a case involving illegal collection of money from college students. The court found that while money was received in the petitioner's account, it was allegedly controlled and operated by his uncle Sachin Mishra (the main accused), and the petitioner is not a college employee, making Section 316(5) inapplicable. The court also noted the investigating officer's non-compliance with Supreme Court directions in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* regarding arrest procedures for offences punishable below seven years. Accordingly, bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur granted bail to Vivek Mishra (24 years old) in a case involving illegal collection of money from college students. The court found that while money was received in the petitioner's account, it was allegedly controlled and operated by his uncle Sachin Mishra (the main accused), and the petitioner is not a college employee, making Section 316(5) inapplicable. The court also noted the investigating officer's non-compliance with Supreme Court directions in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* regarding arrest procedures for offences punishable below seven years. Accordingly, bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts